Project assurance and project audit are both vital mechanisms for maintaining quality and governance. But they operate at different stages of the project lifecycle and serve distinct stakeholder needs.
This video is safe for viewing in the workplace.
This is learning, so, sit back and enjoy
Project Assurance & Project Audit
Project Assurance
Assurance is an ongoing process of providing stakeholders with confidence that projects, programs, and portfolios will meet their objectives for beneficial change and the standards specified by the sponsoring organization.
Assurance ensures that the team employs right methods ffectively and efficiently throughout the project lifecycle.
Project Audit
A Project Audit is a formal review that evaluates a project against specific criteria to assess its performance and compliance. It is a discrete event that occurs at predetermined intervals or is triggered by certain events during the project.
Comparing Assurance and Audit
Assurance is preventative. It sits within the project management team’s daily workflow, focused on identifying risks before they manifest and ensuring the project remains viable throughout its execution.
Project Assurance is a continuous, ongoing process throughout the life cycle. It aims to instill confidence and involves various methods such as scrutinizing data, stakeholder discussions, and monitoring resources throughout the project duration.
Assurance is internal process, often conducted by project or program teams as part of routine evaluations. It is integrated into the project, program, or portfolio management process
In contrast, a Project Audit is a one-time formal evaluation that happens retrospectively. It is typically conducted by independent parties to ensure objectivity and impartiality, assessing compliance and performance against set standards.
Audits are performed by independent individuals or teams that can be internal or external to the organization. However, they are not directly involved in the project being audited, ensuring that there is no conflict of interest.
Relationship between Project Assurance and Project Audit
Project Assurance and Project Audit are interconnected. They both serve the purpose of enhancing project governance and risk management.
While Project Assurance offers ongoing confidence through internal assessment and process adherence, Project Audits provide objective evaluations that can validate the effectiveness of those assurance processes.
Essentially, audits can enhance the level of assurance by using fresh eyes to identify gaps and areas for improvement, thereby fostering a culture of continuous improvement and accountability.
Both processes work in harmony; as Project Assurance identifies risks and opportunities throughout a project, Project Audits can validate these assessments and ensure compliance with the required standards and practices, ultimately contributing to project success and stakeholder satisfaction.
Assurance feeds audit
A well-functioning assurance regime produces the documented evidence, review records, and governance artefacts that auditors examine. If assurance has been rigorous, an audit is faster, cleaner, and less disruptive — because the trail of due diligence already exists.
Audit validates assurance
An audit can expose gaps in assurance coverage that weren’t visible from within the project. A finding that controls were absent or ineffective is, in effect, a finding that assurance failed. This makes audit a quality check on the assurance function itself.
In Summary
Assurance acts as the internal ‘health check’ that keeps the project moving smoothly. Its aim is to build stakeholder confidence and improve delivery outcomes. It asks:
‘What do we need to do to deliver properly?’
Audit acts as the external inspection ‘regulatory check’. Its aim is to establish accountability and verify compliance. It asks:
‘Have we delivered as we said we would?’
Project Assurance & Project Audit Comparison Summary
| Feature | Project Assurance | Project Audit |
|---|---|---|
| Timing | Continuous – Throughout lifecycle | Periodic – Milestone-based |
| Orientation | Integrated, proactive, and preventative | Imposed, retrospective, and evaluative |
| Perspective | Internal (Project-focused) | Independent (Governance-focused) |
| Goal | Improve delivery Prevent failure Provide confidence | Verify compliance Ensure accountability Detect errors and failures |
| Primary Output | Early warnings Real-time recommendations Confidence ratings | Formal report with findings Opinions Corrective actions. |
| Style | Advisory Constructive Challenge-oriented. | Independent Evidential Judgment-oriented |
Recommended Articles and Videos to Help You with Project Governance, Audit, and Assurance
- What are Assurance and Audit in Project Management? Your Awesome Guide
- Project Management Review: A Guide to Project Audit and Assurance
- What is Project Governance? [Video]
- Navigating Success: How to Deliver Excellence with Good Project Governance
- Project Governance 101: A guide to the governance of projects [Video]
- Agony Angels: Setting up Project Governance – with Rich Maltzman [Video]
- 5 Project Governance Tips [Video]
- AI Governance Essentials: A Comprehensive Guide for Enterprises and AI Projects
Learn Still More
For more great Project Management videos, please subscribe to the OnlinePMCourses YouTube channel.
If you want basic Management Courses – free training hosted on YouTube, with 2 new management lessons a week, check out our sister channel, Management Courses.
For more of our Project Management videos in themed collections, join our Free Academy of Project Management.
For more of our videos in themed collections, join our Free Academy of Project Management.
