7 September, 2026

Create Maximum Impact: How to Structure Clear Project Communication


There are many good reasons to sharpen the quality of your project communication. If you don’t want to make a powerful impact with it, then you probably shouldn’t bother with it at all. You have plenty to do as a project manager, so why waste your time on ineffective messages?

A Good Thing

You need to communicate your messages because communication is a ‘good thing’. We hear that a lot, but what does it mean?

  1. The more your team members know, the more they can act autonomously and make their best choices.
  2. You need to keep your stakeholders informed with clear and accurate knowledge as a part of your engagement process.
  3. And your sponsors, clients, managers, and steering groups want to know what is going on, so they can oversee your work and make decisions.

Indeed, project communication is a vital part of good governance. Your written communication will inform decisions and allow oversight. It also creates a record and an audit trail. So, there are lots of reasons to prioritize communication and to prioritize doing it well.

Create Maximum Impact: How to Structure Clear Project Communication

But What Does Excellence in Project Communication Look Like?

I have always worked with a very simple framework for understanding excellence in communication. I try to make my written and spoken communication compelling, persuasive, and powerful.

  1. Compelling
    Your message needs to arouse my interest and compel me to want to keep reading or listening. I want to know more.
  2. Persuasive
    Your communication needs to influence me. I must understand what you are saying and agree with you. You must therefore be able to change my thinking.
  3. Powerful
    Your communication needs to be effective and efficient. It must not just influence me, but prompt me to action and have a long-term impact on me and the world.

Let’s take a look at how you can create each of these, one at a time.

Compelling Project Communication

The principal way to make your words compelling is to use structure. In written reports, you are often given a structure, but how often do you need to report off the cuff? You may need to contribute an opinion in a meeting, or make a recommendation to your sponsor or client.

One way to lose your audience along the way is to start to tell the story, realize you forgo something, go back and slip it in, get back to the story, eventually get to the point, get nervous that people weren’t following, and then repeat your point again… Repeating your point in this way often weakens its impact; rather than strengthening it.  Does this all sound a little familiar?

Structured Response Frameworks

Over the years, I have collated what I refer to as ‘Structured Response Frameworks’. These are simple formulas for how to articulate a message clearly and precisely. Some apply to different situations, but each gives you an agenda that keeps the flow of your narrative clear, and makes it easy for your reader or listener to extract the important messages from what you are saying.

Critically, when you get to the end of the structure response framework, you can be sure that you have covered all the essential ground. This means you can do the one thing that gives your speaking and writing the most impact: stop.

The EIOU Framework

Let’s take an example. Something has gone wrong on your project. You need to make a brief report and recommendation to your board. I would recommend my EIOU framework:

E – Event
I will briefly describe what has happened.

I – Implications
I will set out what the implications are for the project and for the wider stakeholder group. This tells my audience why the event matters and what the potential consequences are.

O – Options
Now I will lay out our realistic options, with a short evaluation of the primary strengths and risks of each course of action.

U – Urging
Finally, I will set out my recommendation for action. I may or may not choose to press my case. This will depend on my own conviction that this is the best option.

Then, I will sit down and shut up.

If you think about it, what more does your board need to know? Any details can be exposed through questions and answers (Q&A), in which they now take the lead. This is as it should be, because I will need them to take ownership of their final decision.

More Structured Response Frameworks

Structured Response Frameworks will help you to get rapidly to the point, and deliver your message in a logical sequence. Here are three more Structured Response Frameworks.

BID

Background – summarize the situation and what is salient about it

Issues – what is the problem and why does it matter

Decision – describe what you will do (or would do) to address the issue

PPP

Position – explain the position we are in

Pressure – describe the pressure that puts us under

Point of View – give your perspective on this: what it means or how we should respond

Hook, Line, and Sinker

Hook – establish a need or appeal to an interest

Line – provide a solution or a compelling offer

Sinker – offer a convincer to show the offer or solution is sound

I’ve shared four examples. There are eight examples of Structured Response Frameworks in my book: How to Speak so People Listen (Pearson, 2013).

Persuasive Project Communication

Many project managers come from a technical background. This means it is easy for you to succumb to a dangerous fallacy. If you want to persuade, all you need is to be right, to set out your case logically, and support it with facts.

Yet, how often have you failed to persuade people, despite being right? I’d guess it happens quite a lot – especially if putting an evidence-based case is your main approach.

To persuade, you must establish three things, of which evidence is just one:

  1. credibility,
  2. evidence,
  3. relevance.

And this is the order that most often works best.

Credibility

Nobody is going to listen to you unless they trust that you are able to speak – or write – with authority. But hang on, you say: I’m the project manager. Of course they trust me.

Indeed, in securing your appointment, you have established a measure of trust and credibility. But for some people, you need to top this up from time to time. For some, you need to refresh your credibility every time you try to influence them.

So here, you must show that you have done your homework. You must look and sound authoritative. Your personal presentation, or your written style and formatting, must communicate the right measure of formality and professionalism, so it does not trigger doubts – however unfounded.

Evidence

In promoting the importance of credibility and relevance, I am not saying the evidence is unimportant. It is crucial. So presenting it well is vital. Select the most powerful argument, supported by your strongest evidence, and create a logical flow of reasoning.

When presenting reasons for whatever you are advocating, keep the number of reasons low. It is easy to assume that more reasons for a course of action make you argument stronger. This is not the case. After a few reasons, each extra one will be less material than the one before. So the effect is diminishing impact. And now, you reader or listener is forgetting the earlier arguments you put. So they think this weaker reason is representative.

One, two, or at most three strong reasons will best make your case. Leave it to others to give the secondary reasons. If you need to throw in more, small justifications, to make your case stick, then it is pretty marginal and you need to either find a better recommendation, or own up to the fact that there is no compelling reason to select one course of action over another.

Relevance

So what? This is the question you must answer.

People don’t make choices based on facts. They make them based on how they feel at the time, and then use the facts later to justify their decisions. They need to justify those decisions both to themselves and to others.

But they first have to want to make the choice you are advocating. So, you must answer the ‘WAM?’ question: ‘What about me?’

To do this effectively, you need to know what matters to them. This is likely to be a mixture of things, with some more important to the person than others. Things like:

  • Self-interest and things like material gain, reputation, or status
  • Their team and how it is affected
  • The organization they represent
  • Society or social value, expressed in multiple ways, like fairness and equity, sustainability, or innovation

Powerful Project Communication

I want to focus on three ways you can make your messages powerful. These are the

  • Language you use,
  • Ways you make what you write or say memorable,
  • Way you set out consequences of action or inaction.

Language

Simple, direct language has power.

Complicated, circumlocutory, jargon-filled management-babble leaves readers and listeners bewildered, befuddled, and mistrustful.

Wherever you can, use short words, short sentences, and straightforward structures. If this is not your strength, use tools like Hemingway App to help you simplify your writing, without losing the important subtleties of your message.

Our project profession is filled with jargon words and acronyms that we share, to make our lives easier. But when others hear those terms, they can feel excluded. Knowing fancy words doesn’t make you smart. Knowing how to communicate with people who don’t know your language – and choosing to do so without patronizing them – is a sign of wisdom. If you must use a jargon word (a ‘term of art’), then be sure to make sure you let your reader or listener understand it.

Making your Words Memorable

How to make a message memorable would fill an article on its own. The danger is that you overuse the one technique we all know: repetition. This is the way to bore your audience and readers. If you repeat yourself, people will get bored. Boredom quickly follows repetition.

Yeah, yeah… got it.

Use two other memory hooks in combination to create appropriate repetition. We tend to remember the first point someone makes. And we also recall the last thing they say or write. So repeat your primary message once at the start, and once at the end. Maybe, once in the middle too.

And, for extra recallability, if you need to make something especially memorable, make it stand out in some way. Often, the most appropriate way to do this is to make the point using different modes, with words, images, tables, diagrams, graphs, models, demonstrations…

Spelling out Consequences

Consequences tend to work like a lever. A small action or inaction now magnifies to a big impact tomorrow.

So, spelling out consequences is a fabulous way to boost the power of what you are saying. It is also worth remembering that fear and pain avoidance are stronger motivators than pleasure and gratification. So maximum power comes from setting out the adverse consequences of alternative choices, rather than the desirable outcomes of what you are recommending.

But beware, if you do that all the time (it’s called motivating with fear), people will start to mistrust your messages, motives, and even integrity. Motivating with fear is not sustainable. It causes stress, exhaustion, and motivation fatigue. Sometimes, a sunny vision for a bright future can bring people along with a sense of joy and enthusiasm.

In Conclusion

Communication is a vital skill for project managers, for many reasons. So it pays to study the ways you can master it. Give your written and spoken messages impact, by making them compelling, persuasive, and powerful. Use seven things: structure, credibility, evidence, relevance, simplicity, memorability, and consequences, to help you.

Learn More

My books include ‘How to Speak so People Listen’, and ‘The Influence Agenda: A systematic approach to aligning stakeholders in times of change’.

Mike Clayton

About the Author...

Dr Mike Clayton is one of the most successful and in-demand project management trainers in the UK. He is author of 14 best-selling books, including four about project management. He is also a prolific blogger and contributor to ProjectManager.com and Project, the journal of the Association for Project Management. Between 1990 and 2002, Mike was a successful project manager, leading large project teams and delivering complex projects. In 2016, Mike launched OnlinePMCourses.
{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}

Never miss an article or video!

 Get notified of every new article or video we publish, when we publish it.

>