Project Managers are positive people. With our toolkit of methods and processes, our boundless optimism, and our can-do attitude, it sometimes feels like we can do anything. Yet the fact is, there are limitations. We must all face some uncomfortable truths.
So, in this article, I’d like to own up to some of the uncomfortable truths that have bothered me.
This is a personal perspective, so it may reflect my own insecurities, rather than yours. But I suspect many of them will resonate with you, as they do with audiences to whom I speak, across the United Kingdom and beyond.

What we will cover
The seven uncomfortable truths I will discuss are:
- Your Stakeholders will Decide whether Your Project is Successful… or not
- You’ll Get the Project Team You Deserve
- You Can’t Control Everything
- You can Please All of Your Stakeholders Some of the Time, and
Some of Your Stakeholders All of the Time;
but you Can’t Please All of Your Stakeholders All of the Time - An Absentee Project Manager is a Contradiction in Terms
- Shift Happens!
- The Level of Attention to Detail can often Make the Difference between Success and Failure
So, let’s get started. And, if you need to talk, please do get in touch with me: the doctor will be listening!
Your Stakeholders will Decide whether Your Project is Successful… or not
I think this is the big one for me. No matter how well you manage your project, ultimately success is not down to you. It will be your stakeholders who decide whether to:
- adopt the processes you build
- use the systems you create
- buy the products you launch
- employ the assets you deliver
- subscribe to the services you develop
This has led me to a simple conclusion. Of all the project management processes and disciplines, stakeholder engagement is paramount.
Famously, Tim Lister said that:
‘Risk management is how adults manage projects’
But where do risks come from? Many of them are down to human factors among…
So, in response to Tim Lister, I’d add that:
‘Stakeholder engagement is how sophisticated adults manage projects’
The only way to regain control of your outcomes from your stakeholders is to invest your time in them. Listen to their advice. Assess their priorities. Understand their perspectives and needs, and work to meet them.
It’s all about communication
For this reason, I suspect project management is all about communication. This, in itself, was an uncomfortable truth for me. Up to a point, I had always assumed that two things were enough to make me a good project manager:
- I was a cool, calm, rational, and logical thinker. I could see the big picture and also drill into the details.
- I was an assertive and achievement-focused professional. I knew the value of hard work and perseverance.
I thought that these two together were enough to succeed as a project manager. And, they are… for some projects. But as the stakes for individuals grow, and the political dimension gets more important, they no longer suffice.
In fact, I would now argue that too much focus on logic and achievement can be a blocker to real success. What you need is willingness and dexterity in communicating with a wide range of stakeholders. Your job is not to be political in your approach. But, you absolutely must engage with the game of politics.
You’ll Get the Project Team You Deserve
Stakeholder engagement is all about communication. But my discomfort grew when I realized that so is project delivery. Because the uncomfortable truth here is that you get the team that you deserve.
This isn’t to say that, if you’re a good person, the universe will reward you with a good team. And if you are a bad person, then the universe will punish you. If only that were true!
Here’s what this means. The investment you put into developing and nurturing your team will dictate the quality of teamwork and individual commitment you will get out. The more you invest, the more you will get – and that will be what you deserve. But, if you fail to invest your time and commitment into your team… Then you will also get what you deserve!
Communication again
So, how do you invest in your team? You guessed it… it’s communication. I came to the conclusion, somewhat reluctantly, that:
‘Project management is 80 percent communication’
Communication is how we work with the team as individuals and as a group. It’s how we develop and share plans. And it’s how everyone can align around a shared commitment to a goal we all understand.
You Can’t Control Everything
Something I have noticed in myself, and in almost every project manager I have known, is this:
‘What project managers crave, above all else, is control’
We are not control freaks. But our job is simple. It’s to bring control to uncertain, complex, shifting, and sometimes confusing environments. And we have designed many of our methods and tools to help us do just that.
Traditional vs Agile
In traditional, predictive project management, we have designed processes and tools to:
- anticipate what will happen and
- plan our work to accommodate risks and contingencies.
But in the even less-certain new world of large-scale software development, that was looking increasingly difficult. So agile methods were born, to place new frameworks around lower-certainty endeavors.
In domains that demand the certainty of planning and estimating, yet also need complex software that poorly lends itself to that approach, project managers have designed hybrid approaches that take the most relevant aspects of each approach.
The Universe is not on your side
The uncomfortable truth here, though, is that the universe won’t take sides. And it certainly won’t respect your plan. For many project managers, a favorite quote comes from a Prussian General. Helmuth von Moltke said:
‘No plan survives first contact with the enemy’
But, as the eternal optimist, I find myself more drawn to a quote from US General, Dwight D Eisenhower:
‘Plans are nothing; planning is everything’
What I take from this is that we cannot control the outcomes. But we can control our preparation and readiness for the unexpected. The reason for planning is to think through what can happen and be able to recognize the importance of the events that unfold.
You can Please All of Your Stakeholders Some of the Time, and Some of Your Stakeholders All of the Time; but You Can’t Please All of Your Stakeholders All of the Time
I’ve paraphrased the classic quote that’s often attributed to Abraham Lincoln or PT Barnum. It reflects my experience. In any complex project, you’ll have many stakeholders. And what each one wants and needs will differ from their colleagues. You’ll have different agendas, power bases, and styles to deal with.
This is why I always think that scoping is the hardest part of project management. This is where you need to reconcile all the different points of view.
But, the uncomfortable truth is that you can rarely do so completely. No matter how hard you work, and how ingeniously you negotiate, there will often be some stakeholders whom you leave at least partially unsatisfied.
The challenge of scoping is to understand which stakeholder must feel content with the outcome, and which scope elements are objectively critical to the project as a whole. A good project manager must therefore be able to read the dynamics of the room and also understand the fundamentals of the project.
Projects are political
This takes us back to the point I made with my first uncomfortable truth. Project managers cannot avoid politics. Scoping is only partly about negotiating the ‘best’ mix of functionality, specification, and quality. It is largely about finding the right political compromise. This is one that respects the relative power of competing stakeholders as well as the relative value of competing functionality.
An Absentee Project Manager is a Contradiction in Terms
There was a time when I went from being seen as a competent project manager to being regarded as a good one.
‘What you do in this world is a matter of no consequence.
The question is what can you make people believe you have done.’
Arthur Conan Doyle, ‘A Study in Scarlet’
At that point, my firm would sometimes ask me to visit other projects. I went partly to evaluate the project and the risk to the firm, and partly to give advice and support to less-experienced project managers. For some reason, those were the days when things went wrong, back at my own project.
The Monitor and Control Cycle
The more frequently you monitor what’s happening on your project, the sooner you pick up problems. The sooner you pick them up, the smaller they are. Consequently, they are easier to resolve. And, because you are monitoring often, you can check on the effect of intervention and tweak it quickly, if you need to.
But, if you fail to monitor often enough, the first you’ll sometimes learn of a problem is when it’s already a big one. So, you’ll need a sizeable intervention to fix it. But then, if it’s a while before you can check up on it, any residual issues can quickly blow up, out of control.
A project manager needs to be present, to monitor and control your project. If you are not, you aren’t managing your project. Therefore, if you must be absent, delegate the management of your project to a colleague whom you trust to make a call that you will be able to support.
Shift Happens!
I’ve already implied the universe has no particular love for your project. Indeed, the reality is worse than that. Your project exists within a wider context of:
- shifting politics,
- evolving technology,
- unstable economics,
- commercial disruption,
- legislative and regulatory churn, and
- threats to security
Is it any wonder that your plan is out of date on day 2?
It’s what I came here for…
As someone who likes predictability, that’s an uncomfortable truth. However, I found that I am also someone who relishes the challenge of constant problem-solving. There’s a sense of achievement when you do something. And there’s even more when you do something against the odds.
The reality for me is that sometimes, a little bit of scary lastminutesmanship is exciting. And that’s what I think a lot of us love about projects. So, abandon any expectation that your project will go to plan, and embrace the challenge of dealing with the unexpected.
The Level of Attention to Detail can often Make the Difference between Success and Failure
Project managers are mostly can-do people. For us, JDI is one adjective short of our favorite mantra*. So, when it comes down to the last stage of a project, or sorting through the final details…
We’d rather be off, starting something new and more exciting. Thank you. Goodbye.
So, the uncomfortable truth here is that we can’t. Or, more accurately, we mustn’t. And it hurts. Because your team will want to be off. Indeed, part of your role will be to manage their exits from your project, and into new placements. You will be no less impatient than them.
But the devil is in the details, to coin a cliché. If you abandon your project before it is finished, or ignore the details because they bore you, there’s a price to pay. And it will be a big one. You’ll have put in 80 percent of the effort. But your project could be only 20 percent of the success it should have been.
Attention to detail is crucial. Without it, you could turn a successful project into a sad failure. Truths doesn’t get more uncomfortable than that.
* JDI stands for Nike’s commercial tagline, Just Do It. Many of the project managers I know prefer JFDI as a slogan!
What Uncomfortable Truths would You Like to Share?
I’d love to read your own uncomfortable truths, so please share them in the comments, below. I will, of course, respond to them all.
Doc Mike, while it is great to see you quoting von Moltke and Eisenhower and alluding to Ludwig Mies Van Der Rohe when he told us that “God (or the devil?) lies in the details”, you are still missing the fundamental truth that for 6,000+ years, humans have been “initiating, planning, executing, controlling, and closing” projects to “create, acquire, update, expand, maintain, repair, and eventually dispose of, ORGANIZATIONAL ASSETS”, and there is NOTHING NEW TO BE FOUND. If we go back in history, we will find that these same problems have been identified in other sectors at different times, and people have come up with SOLUTIONS.
The key remains to stop advocating for the failed systems that PMI, PRINCE2, and APM/APMG rt al have been pushing and start to look at the 6000+ years that shows us what has been TESTED and PROVEN to work. To my knowledge, the only two professional societies who have embraced a fully integrated ASSET, PORTFOLIO, PROGRAM and PROJECT MANAGEMENT system is the Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) with their Total Cost Management Framework https://web.aacei.org/resources/tcm and the UK based International Asset Management with their high quality and FREE publications. https://theiam.org/media/1781/iam_anatomy_ver3_web.pdf
For 39+ years, we have been developing and assessing COMPETENT practitioners, and we would love to benchmark the results produced by your graduates against the results our graduates have produced. https://build-project-management-competency.com/ptmc-training-standards-and-specifications-individual/
Paul, Thank you for your comments. While I do agree completely that project maangement methods go back for as long as (and probably longer than) recorded history, I think it is demonstrably untrue that there is ‘nothing new to be found’. Humans are continually innovating and looking for new ways to solve problems. Of course our ancestors were able to solve the problems they faced. Now, we find new (and often better) ways to solve our problems. In my working life I have seen many new and enhanced tools, methods, and process variants. And the profession is all the stronger for it!
I also have my own criticisms of PMI, APM, APMG, and PRINCE2. More for some and fewer for others. But, they all contributed a lot to the profession and to society. I would never opt for a foolishly binary assessment and describe them as ‘failed systems’. Crucially, they are not failed, nor failing. This kind of binary thinking in a project professional has the very real potential to lead to major problems and I advise my readers (and you) to reject it in favor of a more nuanced, subtle, and balanced assessment of complex matters. And, in passing, APM, APMG, and PMI are organizations not systems. This is more than just a rhetorical category error. Their strengths (and weaknesses) often lie in the choices their people make. I would deprecate some of their choices (more for some of these and less for other), but not rush to bracket whole large organizations into one.
I do not know the AACE or IAM. The documents you link to look interesting and I will take a more careful look when time allows. However, on initial inspection they focus on one (important) range or project concerns – cost and asset management. Therefore, I suspect they offer excellent expert insight to supplement other technical resources. But I doubt they offer and overall view of the full range of skills we need as project professionals.
Finally, you refer to my ‘graduates’. I have none. I offer paid on-demand training resources along with (for most of my working hours) free videos and articles. If people choose to seek out your website and evaluate its content, they are very welcome to. But I would note that the mindset of attacking as much of the profession as you can as a way of standing up your own take on what we do, is a poor approach to marketing. I don’t doubt there is much to value in what you offer, but it’s hard to take it seriously when you offer a rant against approaches and organizations that so many people trust. You may believe the emperor has no clothes, but shouting it does not make it so.
One of the aspects of project management I like to drill into PMs heads is that there is no so such thing as a perfect project. Let me expound. We can read the PMBOK and other documentation on project management, obtain all the PMI (and other) certifications, yet we need to remember that the PMBOK comprehension, the certifications, and all those related things and accomplishments indicates an understanding of the principles of project management from the perspective of a project that fits a straightforward mode. As a project manager you have to be able to apply the tenets of project management, and be adaptive and flexible to the point where you make adjustments to fit a specific project and its organization stakeholders, without violating any PMI ethics or general project management practices.
Basically, apply as much of the PMBOK and project management techniques you have learned, but realize and be ready to make decisions that may not be clearly called out in any formal PM training.
“There is no such thing as the perfect project” would be one I would add to the list of uncomfortable truths that project managers need to understand.
James, you make a good point. Notwithstanding a number of PM influencers, authors, and trainers who refer to their products with labels like (and including) the Perfect Project, such a platonic ideal is, of course, nonsense. All we can aspire to is a project that goes smoothly, satisfies our clients, hurts no one, allows team members to learn, and comes in on budget (or under), on time, and to spec. But that is pretty good, and I’ll take it happily!
And, I feel compelled to add (brag)… I have delivered one of those, over a 2 1/2 year, $8.5m period!
It was NOT perfect, by any means. Challenges and mistakes along the way. But nothing we could not learn and move forward from.